Sunday, June 12, 2011

wallpaper wolf

images Wallpaper Wolf wallpaper wolf. let me edit my pages.)
  • let me edit my pages.)



  • mrajatish
    04-17 03:29 PM
    I have heard of a couple of folks facing this unforseen delay- this happens when your case is audited.





    wallpaper let me edit my pages.) wallpaper wolf. Wolf Wallpaper by deligaris
  • Wolf Wallpaper by deligaris



  • Oasis52
    05-16 09:06 AM
    Thanks you are right on consular processing and you are also right that on transfer receipt one can start working

    But I am still confused on entering USA. I read on all the forums, you can enter usa with a Transfer Receipt if your h1 stamp is still valid.

    So thats something i am trying to sort out.





    wallpaper wolf. wolf wallpaper. wolf
  • wolf wallpaper. wolf



  • frostrated
    08-10 10:09 AM
    frostrated & smuggymba

    Thanks for ur replies....
    As I am EB3 - MAY 2009....No question of I 485 soon....
    thats the reason for the F1....

    U said to show the intent that we leave US back....but my I 140 is approved which makes the letter of intent very contradictory (unless they dont see my papers when processing my wife's F1).

    And also, see the pattern She was on B1 - H4 - F1 (all COS), this is the main concern.
    Whether is the letter of intent makes them believable!!!

    Regarding funds availability, We have funds equivalent to 80% of 1st year fee (which shown on I 20), AND ALSO I AM SUBMITTING AN AFFIDAVIT THAT I AM SPONSORING MY WIFE.

    Frostrated: College is only giving I 20 rest of the things we have to do ourselves.

    140 is on your name and not your wife's. You do not have to show that you are trying to apply for GC. Your sponsorship for your wife is coming from your status as a H1B. IT does not matter how many times you do COS. What matters is the last status you hold, which is H4. B1 to F1 might be an issue, but you dont have to worry about it as your are H4 to F1.

    If college is only providing I-20, no problem. Once you get the I-20, you can apply for COS yourself. You will need to provide a copy of the I-20, ability to pay for at least the first year's of study (bank statements and a letter from the bank, your salary slips as the sponsor, a letter from your employer that you are employed by them and the pay that you are getting - dont need to have skill set like in an employment verification letter), a letter from your wife requesting transfer of status to F1 and the letter should also state that she intends to return to her country of residence (India in your case) at the completion of her studies. Make sure you do not mention about any GC related info. The moment you mention that, it raises a flag and might involve the issuance of a 221(g) - intention to immigrate to the US. A student visa is a non-immigrant intent visa and not a dual-intent visa like a H1B.

    If you have any questions, send me a PM and we can discuss.





    2011 Wolf Wallpaper by deligaris wallpaper wolf. Winter Wolf - Wolves Wallpaper
  • Winter Wolf - Wolves Wallpaper



  • simple1
    09-16 04:19 PM
    If you are genuine: Don’t do it. It will affect your GC.

    If you are losers guild member using Indian name to post: Leave this forum immediately. I am tired of fake posts. I personally believe Riakapoor and ar7165 are fake.

    you can apply for UI - Unemployment insurance, NOT Unemployment benefit. The first is an insurance, the second a benefit that will impact your GC application.

    Hello All,

    I am on a dependent EAD. I lost my job (laid off) few days back. Can I enroll for unemplyment benefits as i am reading the threads that dependents can enroll into UB. But just want to make sure before going forward. We are on I-485 pending status.

    Please suggest.

    Thanks in Advance!

    My gc is in process, both I-140 and I-485 is approved over 180 days back. I have a valid EAD. Recently I lost my job (laid off). Can I apply for unemployment benefit?



    more...


    wallpaper wolf. wolf wallpapers. wolf
  • wolf wallpapers. wolf



  • nixstor
    11-14 02:22 PM
    Got notification from lawyer that my RIR for LC got rejected. It is pending in Phily BEC with a PD of Oct 2003.

    What does this mean? Kiss my LC good bye? Please explian

    Did your lawyer tell you why it got rejected? If not,ask him for more info.





    wallpaper wolf. Wolf - animal, wolf
  • Wolf - animal, wolf



  • gsc999
    01-18 02:09 PM
    waiting, just sent you a pm with details.

    Guys, couple of things:

    - If you are trying to join the Nor. Cal. Yahoo group, please include your phone number in your request.
    - I have added a poll to get a better idea on the number of people
    - Feel free to bring your spouse/kids/friends to this event

    Cheers!



    more...


    wallpaper wolf. wolf psp
  • wolf psp



  • stupendousman11
    09-24 01:43 PM
    EB2 India from NC.

    Filed EAD renewal at TSC (my 485, however, is pending at NSC) on Aug 6. RD Aug 7. No LUDs since the notice was issued.

    EAD CPO email on 9/23 :)

    Wife's EAD (applied together) still pending. No LUDs either.





    2010 wolf wallpaper. wolf wallpaper wolf. Wallpaper Wolf
  • Wallpaper Wolf



  • akgind
    04-21 06:18 PM
    Well California is not same....they took 4 months to renew my lisence....and its purely based on the expiry of the H1B I-94 :mad:

    I renewed my CA license last year. Gave them my expiring license, SS card, and proof of residence. Got new DL valid till 2011. I am on H-1 with a valid EAD.



    more...


    wallpaper wolf. K1 Wallpaper Collection #1
  • K1 Wallpaper Collection #1



  • mirage
    07-16 11:32 PM
    They are all liars. Everybody on the hill knows H1B pays all kind of taxes. It's not worth wasting time in correcting somebody who's not ignorent but telling lies, same is true with Lou Dubbs





    hair Winter Wolf - Wolves Wallpaper wallpaper wolf. Wallpapers · 3D/Abstract Brave
  • Wallpapers · 3D/Abstract Brave



  • dvb
    07-28 02:24 PM
    Your Payments When You Are Outside The United States (http://ssa.gov/international/countrylist4.htm) ??? What does this mean .... looks like you can claim benefits.



    more...


    wallpaper wolf. Night of the Howling Wolf
  • Night of the Howling Wolf



  • canleo98
    09-26 04:15 PM
    Hi, I received the RNs of my wife and me (485,765 and 131) by calling the USCIS today. Online status check shows the receipt date of 09/24. I dont see my checks cashed yet. How much time it takes to get the check cashed ?


    My RN date was Aug 24th and check was cashed on Aug 28th. I guess it usually takes 3-4 days to encash the checks.





    hot wolf wallpapers. wolf wallpaper wolf. eye husky wolf Wallpaper,
  • eye husky wolf Wallpaper,



  • mckottayam
    05-02 06:07 PM
    We came back yesterday May 1st, my wife's stamp is only until May 31st and mine until Aug 30th but we had the extended approval notices. Both H1s. We both got stamped until the end of the extension date on the I 797. I don't think you'll have any problem.



    more...


    house WOLF wallpaper wallpaper wolf. wolf wallpaper. wolf
  • wolf wallpaper. wolf



  • kingkon_2000
    03-26 11:16 AM
    I had my EB2 LC rejected and the reason that DOL gave was they were not able to contact the employer and/or employer did not respond to their correspondence. Lawyer gave me two option to refile (I will lose PD) or appeal. This was in 2005 when PERM had just started and the lawyers said they did not know how long the appeal process takes in PERM since it was new system. To cut the story short I received the approved LC within 45days of appeal, but my case was a simple one I think. Your case it a bit different but in no case an appeal should take 1.5 years at least in PERM.





    tattoo Wolf - animal, wolf wallpaper wolf. wolf wallpaper. anime wolf
  • wolf wallpaper. anime wolf



  • acecupid
    08-21 05:51 PM
    Did you file directly to NSC or TSC?
    DAte, time etc.

    Thanks in advance!

    Applied at NSC and was received on 16th July at 9:30am



    more...


    pictures wolf psp wallpaper wolf. timber, wolf, howling, baying,
  • timber, wolf, howling, baying,



  • little_willy
    09-14 03:45 PM
    The interview with Jay about the rally just started.





    dresses eye husky wolf Wallpaper, wallpaper wolf. Snarling Gray Wolf wallpaper
  • Snarling Gray Wolf wallpaper



  • vinnysuru
    03-28 04:10 PM
    Hi Guys, I am planning to go to Ottawa for stamping. Do you know the email address, I can send this request to? Thanks



    more...


    makeup K1 Wallpaper Collection #1 wallpaper wolf. WOLF wallpaper
  • WOLF wallpaper



  • netnerd
    05-18 09:25 AM
    Hi Guys,

    I just renewed my H1B last month. I used the services of Andrew Dutton. He is excellent and very reasonable. He is also very accessible by email and phone.

    His H1B+H4 renewal legal fees were only $550.

    His email is immigration_counselor@yahoo.com. Try his services, I am confident you will be satisfied.

    Sincerely,

    Paras Dave

    Disclaimer:
    These are my views only. Use at your own risk.





    girlfriend wolf wallpaper. anime wolf wallpaper wolf. new-moon-wolf-pack-wallpaper-
  • new-moon-wolf-pack-wallpaper-



  • waitnwatch
    05-17 11:39 PM
    The original language that was in CIR would exempt from the quota STEM graduates who have worked for 3 years, under the F 4 provision. More importantly, it allows for self petitioning and adjustment of status following a $2000 fee. If this amendment passes, all that would be gone, and simply replaced with the exemption that was already in the original bill. Again I'm puzzled: why are we supporting this amendment?

    I think you are getting slightly confused here. The thing under discussion in this thread has always existed as a clause in the bill and is nothing new. The F4 is a separate provision which was struck down today. The 3 year for STEM provision still exists separate. Please have a look at the details of the bill. It should be available somewhere on this website.





    hairstyles Night of the Howling Wolf wallpaper wolf. Mystic wolf wallpaper
  • Mystic wolf wallpaper



  • she81
    11-09 07:40 PM
    Listen to this. A week after our company filed our 485 (after my conventional labor got approved first week of August) and quite a few of my colleagues were in the same boat, they mysteriously changed our lawyers - apparently none of us had even receipts by then. The old lawyers were not ready to talk to us as they transferred our files to the new firm, and none of us had an idea what to do. On top of that, our HR rep did not provide us with any contact info of the new Law Firm and insisted every communication go through her (and when she forwards their replies to us after taking her own sweet time, very meticulously she removes all contact info from the emails).

    They're never short of ways to annoy us immigrants.





    cagedcactus
    05-03 06:59 PM
    "senator_levin@levin.senate.gov" to me
    show details Apr 30 (3 days ago)

    Dear Mr. Amin:

    Thank you for contacting me regarding immigration and border security. I appreciate receiving your views on these important issues.

    Our immigration system is broken and needs reform. I believe an effective immigration policy must include comprehensive border security and comprehensive immigration reform. We must secure our borders against real threats from terrorism and protect U.S. workers, while preserving the freedoms and principles on which our nation was founded. We must address reforms realistically, stem the tide of illegal immigrants entering the country and be fair to those who are here legally.

    I support comprehensive border security reform. I voted in favor of an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2007 Defense Appropriations Act (P.L.109-289) that appropriated $1.83 billion to construct 370 miles of triple-layered fencing and 461 miles of vehicle barriers along the southwest border of our country. I also supported an amendment to the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Tsunami Relief (P.L.109-13) that provided $390 million to hire an additional 650 border patrol agents, 250 immigration investigators, and 168 immigration enforcement agents and deportation officers, as well as to fund an additional 2,000 detention beds for immigration enforcement purposes.

    I believe any reform must protect U.S. workers. For this reason, I voted in favor of an amendment to the Fair Minimum Wage Act (H.R.2) that would bar employers who violate immigration laws by hiring undocumented workers from receiving federal government contracts for up to 10 years. The Fair Minimum Wage Act passed the Senate on February 1, 2007, and must now be considered by a House-Senate conference committee to reconcile the differences between the Senate and House versions of the bill. I believe it is important to ensure that employers hire only those legally eligible to work and that employees are treated fairly. I support a broad-based Electronic Employment Verification (EEV) system, which builds upon the existing voluntary pilot program, to increase the reliability of employment authorization checks. In the 109th Congress, I supported a number of worker protection amendments to the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act (S.2611). I voted in favor of an amendment that would have established a true prevailing wage for all occupations to ensure that U.S. workers� wages are not lowered as a result of the guest worker program, and I supported an amendment that would have required employers to make good faith efforts to recruit U.S. workers first. S.2611 passed the Senate by a bipartisan vote of 62-36. Unfortunately, S.2611 was blocked by the House because of opposition to the immigration provisions in the Senate bill. The bill was not passed before the end of the 109th Congress.

    Comprehensive immigration reform must remove the �magnet� that has attracted millions of people to cross the border illegally. We should not provide amnesty, but instead permit currently undocumented workers to earn the right to obtain legal status over a long period of time, under restrictive conditions, including being required to pay fees and back taxes. These individuals would be required to apply through the same immigration process as everyone else and take their place in line behind all those whose applications are pending. I will continue to work with my colleagues in the Senate toward effective solutions that address our nation�s real immigration problems. Without a comprehensive approach to immigration reform, our current problems with illegal immigration will likely continue.

    Thank you again for contacting me.

    Sincerely,
    Carl Levin









    CC to senator_levin
    show details 7:36 pm (1 minute ago)

    Respected Sir,

    I wanted to bring to your attention the woes of immigrants who are legally here in U.S. Specifically, the high-skilled workers who are experiencing decade-long waits to get Green Cards (the employment based Green Cards). There are approximately half a million such people in U.S. today whose lives are in limbo as they wait to get their Green Cards. I encourage you to visit http://immigrationvoice.org, an organization comprising of such people who are lobbying the Congress to help get some relief urgently.

    The focus of immigration reform has solely been on illegal immigration. What is not so well understood is that the fate of legal immigrants has been tied with that of the illegal immigrants (because there is just one bill that the Congress will debate - CIR/STRIVE). It is ironic that if this bill does not pass, legal immigrants would be left hanging in the dark again, even when there is bi-partisan support for their cause!

    The waiting times for getting an employment-based (EB) Green Card (GC) are increasing each day for nationals of all countries. But especially hard-hit are people from India and China, whose waiting times are expected to increase to 10-15 years, if the current trend continues. The demand for EB-GC keeps increasing because over the last decade an average of about 100,000 skilled workers have joined the U.S. work-force each year (using H-1B visa, and graduating foreign students), but only 50,000 new employment-based Green Cards are issued. U.S. issues 140,000 EB GC but even family members are counted-off from this quota, which thus effectively reduces to about one-third. Therefore, each year about 50,000 skilled workers join the queue for a Green Card.

    Once the wait for a Green Card starts, all major life-decisions are influenced by the Green Card application process. Decisions about traveling abroad, marrying, investing, kids' education, and changing cities are then based on the stage in which one's GC application is. The biggest impact of the wait is on the person's professional career. Once the process starts, changing jobs usually means re-filing for a GC, implying that the person starts from the end of the line again. Even promotions within the same company are not without risks, as any change in job descriptions necessitates refilling the application. So a person waiting for a GC is expected to remain in the same job with the same company and without any substantial increase (or decrease) in pay! The skilled worker therefore lives life in constant limbo.

    The psychological impact of being stuck and being treated as less than equal, even while paying all taxes (including SS and Medicare, to which they are not even entitled to without becoming permanent residents) is immense.

    Your help is very much needed to eliminate this unfair backlog and reform the system, so that no innocent and law abiding person should suffer anymore. Your kind reply is very valuable to me.

    I appreciate your time and help.

    Regards,
    CC





    Above is the email conversation beween me and Senetor Levine. He seems to be in support for Legal immigration, but is against Amnesty.
    My reply here is basically a nice written post by a fellow member here (Eternal_hope).
    So credit for writing goes to him.
    A similar reply was sent to senetor Debbie Stabenow (Michigan too)

    Please comment......





    Euclid
    03-19 09:55 PM
    Actually, what your HR says makes no sense. You *are* presenting a list A document. According to the receipt rule "the receipt for the replacement suffices (for 90 days) wherever the actual would have sufficed" (I paraphrase).

    So you are in effect presenting a list A document.

    Get some talking points from the net and argue this out with them.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment